BUILDING CULTURAL BRIDGES BETWEEN
ARAB AND JEWISH
UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
by
Ben Mollov and Musa Isa Barhoum
When the late Anwar Sadat made his historic dramatic
trip to Jerusalem 20 years ago this month, he asserted the importance
of bridging the gap between Arabs and Jews by breaking what he
called the "Psychological Barrier." existing between
the two peoples. While real and objective problems need to be
solved between Israelis and the Arabs as part of a peace settlement,
certainly the psychological atmosphere existing between Israelis,
and Palestinians is a factor which can either enhance or retard
the possibilities for peace to develop.
As educators of university students we would like
to share our experiences as supervisors of a unique student dialogue
which has been taking place for the last several years. The dialogue
has involved students from Bar-Ilan University and Palestinian
students from a variety of Palestinian universities. We believe
that the experiences of the above-mentioned dialogue points the
way and serves as an excellent head-start toward the possibility
that both Arabs and Jews can achieve positive perceptions of each
other. In contrast to the belief that religion only serves to
fan the flame of conflict, the dialogue has shown that the religious
cultural background of both Islam and Judaism can contribute to
a friendly psychological atmosphere which will bridge the gap
between the two peoples.
When our students met for the first time three years
ago in Bethlehem, it wasn't clear what common agenda could be
found as a foundation for constructive dialogue. The answers though
appeared to come from the students themselves. It began with an
innocent question by a Jewish woman student to an Arab female
student who asked if she wore the head covering for the same
reason that an Orthodox Jewish woman would. This first exchange
led to other questions and answers, for instance concerning similarities
and differences between the observances of Ramadan and Yom Kippur,
the Kosher and Halal food, the way the two peoples worship the
same G-d, the teachings of the two religions, the belief of the
Moslems and Jews in the same one G-d, the respect and belief of
the Moslems of all the prophets and not discriminating between
anyone of them, the belief of the Moslims that Prophet Abraham
is the grandfather of all Arabs and Jews. As a result of the last-mentioned
point, one of the most important things concluded was the idea
that Moslims and Jews as descendants of Abraham could achieve
improved perceptions of each other. Also they discussed the origins
and similarities among the three monotheistic religions. A variety
of topics were initially discussed. The way the Qu'ran and Prophet
Mohammed recommended the good treatment of the neighbors. Even
during war, the Islamic teachings advise the Moslims not to kill
children, elderly people or women. In one meeting the story and
significance of creation as presented in both the Torah and Qu'ran
were compared; in another meeting, essential prayers and religious
credos in both Islam and Judaism were explored as expressions
of the faith which Arabs and Jews hold dear.
As students from both sides wished to continue their
meetings, it became clear to us that a continued comparison between
Islam, Judaism (and Christianity) served as a highly constructive
foundation for dialogue. Many important issues were dealt with
in a thoughtful manner such as the challenge of bio-ethics, or
the ethics of life concerning both biological and social ecology;
how the two religions update religious structure and observance
in each era; and the manner in which prayer is performed by the
two peoples. Students were pleased to discover almost identical
terminology or concepts for many elements in the two religions,
as reflected in culture and language (for instance such as the
name of G-d).
On several occasions high level student faculty delegations
from Japan and India, who were interested in bio-ethics from a
religious perspective and in conflict resolution, joined and enriched
our deliberations.
Besides the intellectual stimulation, the experience
of scores of our students can make an important contribution
for conflict resolution. Experts in inter-cultural communication
believe that when groups in conflict discover some elements of
commonality in an opposing group, the way can be opened for a
lessening of tension and new more positive mutual perceptions
to emerge.
Again, the activity of the Arab-Israeli students
can be instructive. After discovering commonalities in the two
religious cultures in the semi-formal circle discussions which
opened our meetings, students were then able to divide into their
own informal discussion sub-groups, and over coffee and refreshments,
to discuss freely and openly any topic that was on their minds
including highly controversial political issues in a warm, friendly
and respectful atmosphere.
Interactions between the Israeli and Palestinian
students and faculty have not remained limited to the formal meetings.
Personal relationships have developed which have survived the
vicissitudes of sometimes turbulent current events; members have
reacted constructively during tragedy and difficulty and have
visited each other on personal occasions of both illness and celebration,
thus creating a strong human bond for the dialogues to continue.
From our experience, we do not assume that achieving
a formal Israeli-Palestinian peace will be easy. Both the Israeli
and Palestinian members of the dialogue are proud members of their
communities and have their respective religious and national principles.
However we have found that we can enrich each other and together
discover deeper elements such as our similar religious heritages
which can serve to create a new atmoshpere that would generate
hope instead of despair, while the official leaders on both sides
are summoned to arrive at a peace agreement ultimately to serve
both of our peoples.
We sincerely hope that our efforts will be encouraged
by the formal leadership on both sides and that other groups will
follow our example. In recent years, courageous leaders have
come forward to enable the peace process to develop. President
Sadat understood the importance of breaking the psychological
barrier between Arabs and Jews and building new bridges between
them, and Yitzhak Rabin sensed new possibilities in the region.
It is their legacy which we wish to honor and enlarge upon.
Ben Mollov is a lecturer in political science at
Bar-Ilan University and coordinates the department of Political
Science at the Ashkelon Regional College under Bar-Ilan's auspices. He can be reached through email at mollob@mail.biu.ac.il
Musa Isa Barhoum is an assistant professor at Al-Quds
Open University, He is in charge of the Department of Educational
Technology. He has taught in a number of Palestinian universities. He can be reached throuh email at qudsou@palnet.com