|
|
About
Contact Donations | ||
Today'sSituation News |
EducationalResources for Peace |
Pleasure:Arts & Letters | |
Today's SituationShalom and Netanyahu versus Sharon, Helen Clark versus Israel, Terje Larsen versus Arafat
Thursday, July 15, 2004 13:15
There was Silvan Shalom, the foreign minister, going angrily public to a couple of hundred supporters from the Likud Central Committee about his opposition to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s plan to expand the government, because practically every constellation leads to the inevitable conclusion that Shalom could lose the foreign ministry. So much so, that this morning’s headline in Maariv was ‘Omri Sharon: Silvan wasn’t born foreign minister’ followed by ‘Shalom associates: Sharon was not born prime minister.’ Not that Shalom would ever say it’s his personal future that he’s worried about. Nossir, he told Israel Radio this morning, ‘the truth is that it’s the fate of the Likud and the state that is at stake.’ If Labor joins the government, it won’t be a ‘unity government’ it will be a government that divides the people. Why? Because it would be ‘Leftist, elitist, secular,’ and Likud is a party of the people, who love Jewish tradition. And Shalom, as he’ll never let anyone forget, is originally Tunisian. The Likud cannot afford to be the Right flank of the government, said Shalom, whose control over a few hundred delegates to the Likud Central Committee gives him much power inside the party.
Woman Crucified # 3 by Silvia Rosenberg, mixed media on recycled paper, 20x30 cm.
Nine months of negotiations between the state and the longshoremen, who are worried about their pensions, their salaries and their jobs, failed to reach an agreement between the sides and Netanyahu wants the ports competing with each other, to bring down prices. The workers say that Netanyahu’s plan is to hand over the ports at cheap prices to his ‘billionaire friends’ and that they are fighting for their survival. Netanyahu says that the strike is an example of Histadrut refusal to give up power that it doesn’t deserve. The strike is estimated to cost about NIS 200 million, about $43 million, a day. Another battlefront was Yasser Arafat declaring war on Terje Roed-Larsen, the UN Secretary General’s Special Envoy to the Middle East, the Norwegian diplomat who shepherded the Israelis and Palestinians into the Oslo accords, who has been in the region on behalf of Kofi Annan since the Olso accords were signed. Larsen has long tried to remain sympathetic to Arafat, even when the Palestinian leader would draw him aside and explain that the Israeli Mossad was behind the latest suicide bombing or how the Palestinians had nothing to do with the Karin A arms smuggling boat caught by the Israelis on its way from Iran to Gaza. As a result of his friendship with Arafat, albeit a friendship that reportedly has been under enormous strain in the last year, Larsen was boycotted by Sharon for the last two years, as part of Sharon’s policy to boycott any foreigner who also meets with Arafat. But this week, Roed-Larsen apparently had his fill of Arafat, telling the UN Security Council that the Palestinian Authority was in ‘paralysis’ and that there is a ‘steadily emerging chaos’ in Palestinian areas., Arafat, he said, lacked the ‘political will’ to conduct reforms he has long promised, and Arafat is giving only ‘nominal and partial support’ to security reforms demanded by Egypt. The monthly report also accused Israel of being overly aggressive in the territories and not stopping settlements. But it was Larsen’s comments that the PA is ‘in deep distress and is in real danger of collapse,’ and had made ‘no progress on its core obligation to take immediate action on the ground to end violence and combat terror, and to reform and reorganize’ that infuriated the Palestinians. Arafat aide Nabil Abu Rudeineh went to news agencies in Ramallah last night in response, saying ‘Mr. Roed-Larsen's declarations at the Security Council are unacceptable, and he is not welcome in Palestinian lands.’ Thus, the UN’s special envoy became persona non grata. The Palestinian Ambassador to the UN, Arafat nephew Nasser al-Kidwa, said no formal decision had been made yet, but that the Palestinian delegation would take up the issue of Roed-Larsen’s report with Annan.
Foreign Minister Shalom said this morning that he was ‘certain’ relations with New Zealand will be cleared up in the near future. He did not say how and certainly did not apologize. Israel never – or almost never – admits anyone works for the Mossad and there is no reason to believe that it will change policy this time. Most likely, Jerusalem will just be patient and wait for the three to serve their time and be released, then wait a little while longer, reckoning that eventually the anger in Auckland will blow over. Maybe it will, maybe it won’t. For the meanwhile, however, it’s another Western country offended by an increasingly isolated Israeli government at odds with almost everyone, except the Bush administration, which is also losing patience with the Israeli inability to remove the so-called ‘illegal outposts’ in the West Bank. The two White House officials, Stpehen Hadley and Elliot Abrams who have the Israel portfolio in the National Security Council, were here this week for a ‘maintenance’ visit, asking about the Israelis about the disengagement, the outposts, a freeze in settlement construction, and easing humanitarian conditions for the Palestinians. They weren’t meeting with the press, so nobody knows what they thought about the list of 28 outposts that Israel says it will remove soon. Several of the outposts have been removed, including a few that have been repeatedly removed, and meanwhile have grown bigger than ever. Defense ministry officials, including Likud deputy defense minister Zeev Boim, openly say that the ministry has to provide security for the residents, meaning paving roads and installing electricity and water infrastructure – for the soldiers guarding the settlers, who are actually breaking the law by being in the outposts. No wonder the New Zealanders don’t understand why the Israelis didn’t think it necessary to apologize.
Recommended articles Welcome to World War III by Robert Rosenberg Suicide bombing is the weapon of choice in what has turned into World War III, and wherever you are, it's coming to a neighborhood near you. It's as old as Samson pulling down the pillars on the Philistines, and emerged in the early 1980s as a strategic weapon for the Lebanese Hezbollah, which used it to force American and French troops out of Lebanon. Since then it has been copied by Palestinian, Kashmiri, Chechen, Turk, and Tamil terrorists, used in places as far flung as Argentina and Tanzania, Kenya and Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Iraq, India, Israel, Spain and of course, in the U.S. on September 11, 2001. Ariga: Peace: Historic Documents and Treaties: International Court of Justice: Legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occupied Palestinian territory: July 9, 2004 [an error occurred while processing this directive] in Frosties, the anthology of quotations
Today's Situation || Yesterday's Situation
|
Ariga: Today's Situation, 2006
Painting Please check out our Google advertisers
Make a donation to Ariga ![]() The People's Voice Petition for Peace for Israel and Palestine
Don't miss:
|